Men : Women = Men : Materialistic Possessions??
No, I haven’t started coaching for the SATs. This is a thought that occurred to me recently when I overheard a couple of college mates raving about a particular car (conversations all too commonly heard in Dubai, a vehicle fanatic’s haven). I am referring to the similarity in attitude that the typical male bears when dealing with his sexual counterpart, and the physical effects that give him pleasure.
Looking at it objectively, purely on the basis of observable phenomena, one can quantify this attitude into three factors:
And now, upon finishing this post, I am confused on what I meant to imply in the first place. Oh well. Guess this is just one of those posts that is destined to be looked back upon as the fruit of unnecessary thought. :S
Looking at it objectively, purely on the basis of observable phenomena, one can quantify this attitude into three factors:
- Money : Money in the past and in rural areas till today plays a heavy role in deciding whether a woman is even worth matrimonial alliance or not. I’m referring of course, to the long drawn custom of Dowry. Although Dowry is not too much of an issue in the modern areas which we reside in, it doesn’t mean money has lost itself as a factor of this attitude with urbanization. It has in fact, evolved and hence earned connotations, perhaps most apparent through inheritance of fortunes held by prospective life-partners, and the existence of high class and low class prostitution. In the case of materialism, money has an obvious and all-powerful role.
- Colour : Hey. If I’m going out to pick up a new mobile or a car, the colour is most definitely not going to be a non-issue. What is important to understand at this point is that I am trying to bring about a comparison in the criteria that most men would definitely consider before committing to an article of luxury, or a woman. All men, or for that matter, all women too have a certain image in mind of their ideal mate. By ideal, I certainly don’t mean to imply that the person is not going to budge from that image which he has in mind. But definitely, he or she would accept only that ‘someone’ who has the most desirable of those qualities. And in majority of the cases, colour fairly prepossesses those desired attributes, in most cases, subconciously. And this is not a fact I’ve conjured out of nowhere. I checked those figures (Bless the Internet), and in each case, be it among women or men, white with coloured matches always fell far below 50%. Anyway, in India at least, there is hardly any stress required to spell out this fact, or to prove it. The infamous ‘Fair and Lovely’ says it all…
- Outward Appearance : Many would club colour under this, but by outward appearance, I mean the looks, so to say. An example being that a dark person can very much be just as beautiful, attractive or sexy as one with a fairer complexion. Take for instance, Naomi Campbell, Halle Berry (Die Another Day’s orange bikini, Catwoman’s oh-so-tight costume) or Denzel Washington. There…now you see it. No matter how much they say, “It’s what’s inside that matters”, hardly anyone would like to go for someone who’s a gem inside but a horror on the outside. There are the occasional exceptions, no doubt. But exceptions are always there aren’t they? It’s what the majority is that is taken into census. Most in fact, even end up compromising on what lies beneath for what’s on the surface. Certainly unwise…but so it is. And materialism, well, even if a Maruti 800 was as capable a car as a BMW, doubtful if anyone would go for it, especially if they had the money to afford a BM. All because of its…? You’re in a position enough to answer that now.
And now, upon finishing this post, I am confused on what I meant to imply in the first place. Oh well. Guess this is just one of those posts that is destined to be looked back upon as the fruit of unnecessary thought. :S
Rate this post!
(Username: tjblog , Password: ratepost)





16 Comments:
I'll differ on that.
Just because we have our human ways of liking something more than others, because of its looks, does not necessarily imply that it is a material posession.It could be, but not necessarily at all.
And, believe you me, true love definitely exists.
By
H d e m u S, at Friday, July 14, 2006 11:08:00 PM
I'm hardly denying the existence of true love. All I'm saying is that true love in majority of the cases is preceeded by the influence of this attitude. And it is the similarity in attitudes when dealing with things and people that I aimed to bring out.
By
The Grand High Tuski, at Saturday, July 15, 2006 3:00:00 AM
Its true. Majority of the people, atleast in India, do alot of the things keeping in mind "what other people would think about it". You can't blame them though, alot of people sometimes even use materialistic possessions only and only to "fit in" or be "with the times". May it be the "latest" mobiles, "latest" cars or "latest" gadgets, there's a rat race going on amongst most people and their respective peer groups.
Human nature, I believe is to always be able to get that stamp of approval/appreciation from other people in society. I feel many a times that that stamp is required in order to compensate for their own short comings. But yes, superficiality rules and now a days its more like, have it so flaunt it..!
Notions like "fair=marriagable material" has been fed into Indians' minds. Such is the majic of "fair and lovelys" and "rup amrits"...Sheesh!
NOTE = Overuse of "" has been done only to put forward generalised opinions/phrases/notions. They may/may not be my own personal beliefs.
By
Saurabh Chandan, at Monday, July 17, 2006 12:23:00 AM
Finally...u post something :) I dont believe that true love exists nowadays.. and not just these 3 but many more reasons attract ppl to each other...its everything but love.
By
AINDRILA, at Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:49:00 PM
ballocks
By
Anonymous, at Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:50:00 PM
Um...first up...sorry for da..... how shall i put it..absurd nic...(outward appearence!!)
Well..u HAd told me it was complex...well..apparently..u were right...I completely lost u after da introductory para..
Goin by da title n a bit of intro, i thot u were goin to point out da similarities b/w gals n cars:
1) Both shud be sexy
2) Both should make u proud
3) Good models are ALWAYS expensive
4) Maintenance is difficult...
Regular stuff of which intending-to-be-humorous-but-actually-humungous chain mails are made...
But no.. u jump to DOWRY..~~!!
After dat..im sorry it was ground zero for me!!
But this does not take away credit from the fact that ur posts on colg life are excellent....n more refreshingly..truthful...wid almost no exaggeration...makes me remember certain days of da year gone by...plus I absolutely salute ur tenacity to post as frequently as u do (barring a small interlude..)
Ok..now dis is turnin into a public mail...so adios...
By
sugarboy_salty, at Sunday, July 23, 2006 1:37:00 AM
this sucked.
We've heard these comparisons so many times that nobody bothers to read these anymore.
By
Anonymous, at Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:40:00 PM
dude,
you seriously have to get over your failed relationship man. stop wallowing in the dirt of your life, and get a move on.
since when'd you become an expert in women dude?
the last i remember, you came to ME for advice.
and if you think true love doesnt exist, then it's just one of those classic withdrawal symptoms after a failed relationship. so fuck it!
i know it exists, coz i have it. you'll probably die without it if you go on like this.
as for the women, you need a lot more advice.
if you wish to comment about this, you already know i'm least interested.
take care.
By
vishal, at Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:39:00 AM
'..and if you think true love doesnt exist, then it's just one of those classic withdrawal symptoms after a failed relationship..'
1) Read my earlier comment a bit more carefully.
2) Neither do I give a damn about your eccentric misconceptions nor about your overreaction to something that I've long since apologised for.
3) How can I possibly have withdrawal symptoms about something I'm ecstatic is over.
4) If you think you're an expert on women, then remain under that sad, erroneous belief . I'm simply voicing out my opinion, rather than proclaiming myself as all-knowing.
Cheers!
By
The Grand High Tuski, at Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:23:00 PM
Oh, and you've experienced true love? When? Ah, okay. When you were two timing on your existing girl whom you claimed to love with all your heart. Wow...you really have brought a new meaning to this term. Innovative indeed.
By
The Grand High Tuski, at Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:36:00 PM
heard of the term 'fling'?
my girl doesn't have issues with it. why do you?
i can't help that i am such a fabulous romeo that ladies are goin ga-ga all over.
By
vishal, at Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:13:00 PM
Hmm...from what I gathered, you were least interested in what I had to say. What happened smarty pants?
By
The Grand High Tuski, at Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:31:00 PM
vishal..u shud have a chat with him.blogs were never meant for that..
By
swathi sridharan, at Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:37:00 PM
i like the comparisons.. they're decently researched.. however, some of the points of analysis are a tad cliched and very subjective.. predictably so... the stereotypical know-it-all-ness of the patriarch that is you, tushar "genius" joneja! just kidding.. good effort, man.
cheers.
By
Rachita, at Friday, August 18, 2006 12:22:00 AM
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it »
By
Anonymous, at Friday, March 02, 2007 7:18:00 AM
TL;DR
Anyway. Whatev I cud figure out from the title. It's the truth. So wut?
By
Anonymous, at Monday, August 04, 2008 3:26:00 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home